The development of copyright contained in Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright provides legal protection for the creation of copyrighted works. In addition, the Copyright Law has a provision that copyright can also be used as an object of fiduciary guarantee. This shows that copyright is currently very useful for holders of copyrighted works because their creation can be used as collateral to get debt in a fiduciary manner. The practice of Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary which is a legal umbrella for parties in carrying out fiduciary practices has not fully accommodated the implementation of copyright as a fiduciary guarantee, therefore it is necessary to do research on how the concept of copyright regulation can create legal certainty ? and how can the concept of copyright execution as the object of fiduciary collateral in implementing the law on fiduciary be able to bring about legal certainty? The research carried out was descriptive, namely describing the symptoms in the community towards a case to be studied, the approach taken was a qualitative approach which was the method of research that produced descriptive data. The types and sources of legal material in this study use the Civil Code, Trade Criminal Code, Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 9/6 / PBI / 2007 as legal material primary, expert theories as secondary legal material. This legal research uses data collection techniques by studying documents or library materials from both print and electronic media (internet). The data obtained will be analyzed descriptively. The results of the study found that some of the reasons for this were the lack of socialization regarding the provisions so that copyright holders did not know it, the reluctance of banks or other guarantee institutions to accept copyright as an object of fiduciary guarantee because the implementation rules of the provision were unclear, and the existence provisions in Bank Indonesia Regulation (PBI) Number 9/6 / PBI / 2007 which regulate limitatively about movable objects which can be used as fiduciary guarantees while copyrights are not listed as one of them, so banks are hesitant to accept copyright as fiduciary guarantee, while banks or other guarantee institutions certainly hold the principle of prudence in providing credit loans.
17-10-2019
Setiawan, T. (2019). Konsep Hak Cipta Sebagai Jaminan Fidusia Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta dan Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum. JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA, 8(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.30999/mjn.v8i1.665
Article
Similar Articles
- Jajang Sultonudin, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Warga Binaan Dalam Memperoleh Hak Atas Pemenuhan Makanan Yang Layak Dikaitkan Dengan Pengelolaan Keuangan (Studi Pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Cikarang) , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): Februari 2021
- Andi Nurul Huda, Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Dengan Modus Operandi Kawin Kontrak Dikaitkan Dengan Undang Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020): September 2020
- Reza Krisnawan, Kedudukan Mediasi Struktural Perceraian Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS) Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 45 Tahun 1990 Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020): September 2020
- Cecep Rahman Permama, Akibat Hukum Penolakan Itsbat Nikah Oleh Pengadilan Agama Terhadap Status Perkawinan Dan Status Anak Berdasarkan Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Indonesia , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020): September 2020
- Uskandar Uskandar, Perlindungan Hukum Anak Korban Eksploitasi Seksual Komersial Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor:186/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Grt) , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021): Februari 2021
- Zul Azmi, Disparitas Pemidanaan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 125/Pid.Sus. TPK/2018/PN.Bdg. dengan Putusan Perkara Nomor 126/Pid.Sus.-TPK/2018/PN.Bdg.) , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): Februari 2020
- Ratna Kartika, Penerapan Asas Restitusi Sebagai Pedoman Kepastian Hukum Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Korban Perdagangan Orang Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Studi Kasus Perkara Berdasarkan Nomor 187/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Grt) , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): Februari 2020
- ANNISA SUSINTA, Criminological Review of the Death Penalty Crime Against Drug Crimes in the Perspective of Human Rights Law , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 15 No. 2 (2025): September 2025
- Fontian Munzil, Perspektif Yuridis Kedudukan Perbankan Sebagai Pengelola Dana Kartu Uang Elektronik (Electronic Money) Terkait Dengan Perlindungan Konsumen , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017): September 2017
- Fontian Munzil, Tinjauan Yuridis Perusahaan Induk Perbankan (Bank Holding Company) & Fungsi Holding Terhadap Kemandirian Yuridis Anak Perusahaan Perbankan Pada Perbankan Nasional (Studi Penerapan POJK 39/POJK.03/2017 Tentang Kepemilikan Tunggal) , JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018): Februari 2018
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.