DETERMINAN RENTABILITAS BANK UMUM BUKU-4 DI INDONESIA

Nani Ernawati

doi:10.30999/ekubis.v3i2.1210

Authors

Nani Ernawati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30999/ekubis.v3i2.1210

Keywords:

net interest margin, loan to deposit ratio, transaction cost

Abstract

This study investigated the internal factors that affecting factor of Indonesia BUKU-4 conventional commercial bank’ rentability on quarterly data of 6 banks during 2016Q1 to 2018Q3. The results reveal several main drivers of bank’s net interest margin in (NIM) and return on assets (ROA) in Indonesia. We found that operating expenses to operating income (BOPO) and equity to assets ratio (EAR) affect net interest margin positively. Beside that, we found that operating expenses to operating income (BOPO) and net interest margin in (NIM) affect return on assets (ROA) positively. It is recommended that empirical studies should be undertaken in the same field to find out what more internal factors could affect bank’ net interest margin and return on assets in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almazari, A. A. (2014). Impact of Internal Factors on Bank Profitability: Comparative Study between Saudi Arabia and Jordan. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 4(1), 1-7.

Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometrics (4th ed.). Springer.

Beck, T., & Hesse, H. (2009). Why are interest spreads so high in Uganda. Journal of Development Economics, 88, 192–204.

Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Keuangan (11th ed., Vol. 2). (A. A. Yulianto, Trans.) Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Brooks, C. (2008). Introductory Econometrics for Finance (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Chan, C. W., & Lopez, V. (2014, July-Augustus). A Qualitative Descriptive Study of Risk Reduction for Coronary Disease among the Hong Kong Chinese. Public Health Nursing (PHN), 31(4), 327-335.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualititative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, & Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications, Ltd.

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2010). ESSENTIALS OF ECONOMETRICS (Fourth ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Hou, X., Wang, Q., & Li, C. (2015). Role of off-balance sheet operations on bank scale economies: Evidence from China's banking sector. Emerging Markets Review, 22, 140-153.

Kaufman, G. G. (2013, June). TOO BIG TO FAIL IN BANKING: WHAT DOES IT MEAN? Paper Series, SPECIAL PAPER 222. LSE FINANCIAL MARKETS GROUP SPECIAL PAPER SERIES.

Kevin, A. (2018, Maret 29). cnbcindonesia.com. Retrieved Maret 6, 2019, from CNBC INDONESIA: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20180329163505-17-9072/bank-domestik-terlalu-serakah-keruk-nim

Koran Jakarta. (2018, May 23). http://www.koran-jakarta.com. Retrieved February 25, 2019, from http://www.koran-jakarta.com/marjin-bunga-bank-terlalu-tinggi/

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). The Constructivist Credo. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press, Inc.

López-Espinosa, G. M. (2011). Banks’ net interest margin in the 2000s: A macro-accounting international perspective. Journal of International Money and Finance, 30, 1214–1233.

Mankiw, N. G. (2018). Principle of Microeconomics (Eight ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

Maudos, J., & Solís, L. (2009). The determinants of net interest income in the Mexican banking system: an integrated model. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33, 1920-1931.

Maudosa, J., & Guevara, J. F. (2004). Factors explaining the interest margin in the banking sectors of the European Union. Journal of Banking & Finance, 28, 2259–2281.

Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2012). Introduction to linear regression analysis (5th ed.). Willey.

Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basic of Social Research: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches (2nd ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

OJK. (2017, Maret 17). SURAT EDARAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN NOMOR 14/SEOJK.03/2017. Surat Edaran. Jakarta, Indonesia: OJK.

OJK. (2020). Satistik Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: OJK-Indonesia.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2015). KEWAJIBAN PEMENUHAN RASIO KECUKUPAN LIKUIDITAS. Peraturan OJK NOMOR 42/POJK.03/2015. Jakarta, Indonesia: OJK.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2015). Staitistik Perbankan Indonesia 2018. Jakarta: OJK.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017, Maret 17). SURAT EDARAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN NOMOR 14/SEOJK.03/2017. Surat Edaran. Jakarta, Indonesia: OJK.

PWC Indonesia. (2018). 2018 Indonesia Banking Survey: Technology shift in Indonesia is underway. Jakarta: PWC.

Schildbach, J. (2017, April 25). Large or small? How to measure bank size. Horses for courses. Frankfurt, Germany: Deutsche Bank Research.

Staikouras, C. K., & Wood, G. E. (2004). The Determinants Of European Bank Profitability. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 3(6), 57-68.

Terraza, V. (2015). The effect of bank size on risk ratios: Implications of banks’ performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30, 903 – 909.

Thich, P. D. (2017). Determinants of Banks’ Profitability: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 5(4), 37-45.

Ullah, A. (2004). Finite Sample Econometrics: Advance Text in Econometrics (1st ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.). South-Western.

Zhou, K., & Wong, M. C. (2008). The Determinants of Net Interest Margins of Commercial Banks in Mainland China. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 44(5), 41-53.