PENGALAMAN GURU SD DALAM MENGGUNAKAN SMART BOARD SEBAGAI STRATEGI PENGELOLAAN FOKUS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

Authors

  • Asmi Khoirudin Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Sri Handayani Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia
  • Eva Dianawati Wasliman Universitas Islam Nusantara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30999/ujmes.v11i1.4003

Keywords:

Smart Board, mathematics education, attention management, pedagogical strategies, educational administration

Abstract

Maintaining students learning focus in mathematics presents a critical pedagogical challenge in the digital era, particularly as screen time increases and attention spans decline. This study explores elementary school teachers' experiences in utilizing Smart Board as a strategic tool for managing students' learning focus in mathematics instruction. Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach, in-depth interviews and non-participatory observations were conducted with upper-grade teachers (grades IV and V) at SDN 227 Margahayu Utara who had utilized Smart Board for a minimum of one semester. Data were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña interactive model with triangulation and member checking for validity. Findings reveal that teachers develop six sophisticated pedagogical strategies: visual-interactive engagement, progressive participation, multimodal variability, content selectivity, rule-based interactivity, and technical anticipation. Teachers integrate dynamic visualization and real-time manipulation of mathematical objects to create anticipatory attention, with optimal session duration of 15-40 minutes to prevent attention fatigue. From an administrative perspective, successful implementation critically depends on comprehensive school support systems, including continuous professional development and responsive technical support. This study confirms that Smart Board effectiveness depends on teachers' pedagogical expertise rather than technological capabilities alone, requiring collaborative commitment between teachers and school administrators for systemic change

References

Akdeniz, R. K., & Konaklı, T. (2022). The Emergence, Reasons and Results of Resistance to Change in Teachers. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership, 8(1), 49-67. https://doi.org/10.25233/ijlel.1107137

Aktas, S., & Aydin, A. (2016). The effect of the smart board usage in science and technology lessons. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 16(64). http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.64.7

Al Musafiri, M. R., & Miftahurrohmah, N. (2022). Prophetic parenting pola asuh orangtua dalam pembentukan karakter anak usia dini. Jurnal At-Taujih, 2(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.30739/jbkid.v2i1.1471

Aminah, N., & Wahyuni, I. (2018). Kemampuan Pedagogic Content Knowledge (PCK) Calon Guru Matematika Pada Program Pengalaman Lapangan di SMP/SMA Negeri Kota Cirebon. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v2i2.1291

Azhari, M. (2024). Hubungan Antara Kecerdasan Emosional dan Pola Asuh Authoritative dengan Prestasi Belajar. Komprehensif, 2(2), 275–284. Retrieved from https://ejournal.edutechjaya.com/index.php/komprehensif/article/view/760

Balkist, P. S., Dasari, D., & Fitriasari, P. (2023). Analisis Pengalaman Pengembangan Diri Guru Matematika Terhadap Pembelajaran Yang Berdiferensiasi Dan Mendorong Berpikir Kritis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 1297–1308. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i1.6829

BR GINTING, S. M. (2024). Pentingnya Penerapan Psikologi Pendidikan Terhadap Fokus Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas IV Pada SD Neegeri 030438 Tanah Pinem Tahun Ajaran2023/2024 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Quality Berastagi).

Cabus, S. J., Haelermans, C., & Franken, S. (2017). SMART in Mathematics? Exploring the effects of in-class-level differentiation using SMART board on math proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12350

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Davidovitch, N., & Yavich, R. (2017). The Effect of Smart Boards on the Cognition and Motivation of Students. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 60–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n1p60

Dillenbourg, P., Jermann, P. (2010). Technology for Classroom Orchestration. In: Khine, M., Saleh, I. (eds) New Science of Learning. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5716-0_26

Farhana, S., Amaliyah, A., Safitri, A., & Anggraeni, R. (2022). Analisis persiapan guru dalam pembelajaran media manipulatif matematika di sekolah dasar. Matematika, 1(5).

Fitri, A. (2023). Inovasi media pembelajaran pada mata pelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. Karimah Tauhid, 2(2), 442–448. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v2i2.7946

Fullan, M. (2023). The principal 2.0: Three keys to maximizing impact. John Wiley & Sons.

Habesia, H., Razilu, Z., & Saputra, H. N. (2025). Media Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Interaktif Kelas V Pokok Pembahasan Bangun Ruang. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 5(3), 896–905. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v5i3.1889

Hamdan, K., Al-Qirim, N., & Asmar, M. (2012). The effect of Smart Board on students behavior and motivation. In 2012 International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT) (pp. 162–166). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/INNOVATIONS.2012.6207703

Harrison, M., Burns, C. F., McGuinness, M., Heslin, J., & Murphy, N. M. (2006). Influence of a health education intervention on physical activity and screen time in primary school children: 'Switch Off--Get Active'. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 9(5), 388–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2006.06.012

Hendrawan, D. N., & Hendriana, B. (2021). Pola Asuh Orang Tua Siswa dengan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Tingkat Tinggi pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i3.669

Ikram, F. Z., & Turmudi, T. (2025). Eksplorasi pengalaman guru matematika dalam menggunakan guru belajar untuk meningkatkan kompetensi guru. Wilangan: Jurnal Inovasi dan Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 64–78. https://dx.doi.org/10.62870/wjirpm.v6i1.31862

Jannah, F. N. M., Nuroso, H., Mudzanatun, M., & Isnuryantono, E. (2023). Penggunaan aplikasi canva dalam media pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 11(1), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.20961/jpd.v11i1.72716

Keller, J. (2008). On the development of regulatory focus: The role of parenting styles. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(2), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.460

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Liu, M., Ren, Y., Nyagoga, L. M., Stonier, F., Wu, Z., & Yu, L. (2023). Future of education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Consensus among Chinese scholars on applications of ChatGPT in schools. Future in Educational Research, 1(1), 72-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.10

Marquez, N. (2023). Influence of applications and usage of technology on student engagement in the classroom a qualitative study. Liberty University.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Min, K., & Siegel, C. (2011). Integration of SMART board technology and effective teaching. Imanager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 7(1). https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/education-facultypubs/54/

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Muhanna, W., & Nejem, K. M. (2013). Attitudes of mathematics teachers toward using smart board in teaching mathematics. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 6(4), 373–380. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1073218

Muthmainnah, S. N., & Marsigit, M. (2018). Gaya mengajar guru pemula dan guru profesional dalam pembelajaran matematika sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 3(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v3i2.896

Nabila, N. A. (2025). Konsep Dasar Psikologi Pendidikan Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pelita Ilmu Pendidikan (JPIP), 3(2), 33–36. https://doi.org/10.69688/jpip.v3i2.138

Nurhikmah, N., Rustiani, S., & Nurdin, N. (2024). Literature Review: Media Game Edukasi Interaktif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 4382–4390. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1573

Ojinna, C. (2023). Teacher expertise in educational technology associated with perceived student engagement: A qualitative descriptive case study [Disertasi doktoral, University of Phoenix].

Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., Nurmi, J.-E., & Aunola, K. (1998). Mothers' and fathers' well-being, parenting styles, and their children's cognitive and behavioural strategies at primary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173104

Permatasari, K. G. (2021). Problematika pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar/madrasah ibtidaiyah. Jurnal Pedagogy, 14(2), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.63889/pedagogy.v14i2.96

Qi, J., Yan, Y., & Yin, H. (2023). Screen time among school-aged children of aged 6–14: A systematic review. Global Health Research and Policy, 8(1), Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-023-00297-z

Sadiyah, Sista Liana, & Mufaro’ah. (2024). Studi Tentang Kesulitan Fokus Anak dalam Pembelajaran: Tinjauan Psikologis dan Edukatif. PIJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 3(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.58540/pijar.v3i1.646

Sangawi, H., Adams, J., & Reissland, N. (2015). The effects of parenting styles on behavioral problems in primary school children: A cross-cultural review. Asian Social Science, 11(22), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n22p171

Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Spruijt, A. M., Dekker, M. C., Ziermans, T. B., & Swaab, H. (2018). Attentional control and executive functioning in school-aged children: Linking self-regulation and parenting strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.004

Stroetinga, M., Leeman, Y., & Veugelers, W. (2021). Primary School Teachers' Practices of Collaborating with Parents on Upbringing. School Community Journal, 31(1), 259–281. https://www.schoolcommunitynetwork.org/scj.aspx

Switrayni, N. W., Wardhana, I. G. A. W., Irwansyah, I., Aini, Q., Salwa, S., Awanis, Z. Y., & Maulana, F. (2023). Pelatihan pembuatan kuis interaktif dengan aplikasi Quizizz dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pepadu, 4(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.29303/pepadu.v4i1.2244

Tanaka, C., Tanaka, M., Okuda, M., Inoue, S., Aoyama, T., & Tanaka, S. (2017). Association between objectively evaluated physical activity and sedentary behavior and screen time in primary school children. BMC Research Notes, 10(1), Article 175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2495-y

Utomo, P., Prayogi, F., & Pahlevi, R. (2022). Bimbingan dan Konseling Keluarga: Pola Asuh Orang Tua dan Implikasinya terhadap Penanaman Nilai-Nilai Karakter pada Anak. Prophetic: Professional, Empathy, Islamic Counseling Journal, 5(1), 35–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/prophetic.v5i1.11170

Valcke, M., Bonte, S., De Wever, B., & Rots, I. (2010). Internet parenting styles and the impact on Internet use of primary school children. Computers & Education, 55(2), 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.009

Yeni, E. M. (2015). Kesulitan belajar matematika di sekolah dasar. Jupendas: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), Article 71281. https://www.neliti.com/publications/71281/kesulitan-belajar-matematika-di-sekolah-dasar

Zeng, S., Rahim, N., & Xu, S. (2025). Integrating Mobile AI in Art Education: A Study on Children's Engagement and Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 19(11). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i11.54847

Downloads

Published

2026-01-12

Citation Check