Revitalisasi Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Menghadapi Problematik Paradoks Globalisasi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30999/jpkm.v1i1.17Keywords:
Benchmarking, Globalization, Local and Global Competency, Tridharma.Abstract
Problematic life of the nation is becoming increasingly complex and chaotic. In many ways the problem is not only novel and divergent, but sometimes clashing with the occurence in the past. Of course it does not happen in our country only. Many countries around the world have experienced the same thing. In essence of education, we are strongly face a problematic paradox in the nature of globalization: From one point of view, we must build the quality of education in accordance with a reference quality (benchmarking) of global competence so that we would not be marginalized in competition between nations - on the other side of education we bound to consider the quality of education in diversity and local knowledge to enable students undergoing life on the earth we live. Therefore, the implementation of the Dharma community services should be adjusted to surmount problematic in such a very convoluted life.
References
Anthony, R.J., Terry D. Johnson, Norma I. Mickelson, & Alison Preece. (1991). Evaluating Literacy. A Perspective for Change. Toronto: Irwin Publishing.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2000). Panduan Pelaksanaan Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat oleh Perguruan Tinggi. Direktorat Pembinaan Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat, Ditjen Dikti, Depdiknas.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2004). Keterampilan Dasar untuk Hidup. Literasi Membaca, Matematika, & Sains. Laporan Program for International Student’s Assessment. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan.
Kirsch, Irwin S., Ann Jungeblut, Lynn Jenkins, & Andrew Kolstad. (1993). Adult Literacy in America. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Komisi Nasional Pendidikan. (2001). Menuju Pendidikan yang Bermutu dan Merata. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Mullis, Ina V.S., Ann M. Kennedy, Michael O. Martin, & Marian Sainsbury (2006). PIRLS 2006 Assessment Framework & Specifications. 2nd Ed. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
OECD. (2003). Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow – Further Results from PISA (2000). Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development & Unesco Institute for Statistics.
UU No. 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional
Yusuf, Suhendra. (2006a). Pengembangan Model Ujian Nasional Berdasarkan Pendekatan Literasi (Kajian Tentang Struktur Soal dan Daya Serap Siswa SMP/MTS dan SMA/MA di Jawa Barat dalam Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Ujian Akhir Nasional 2004. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Yusuf, Suhendra. (2006b). Membangun Kompetensi Global, Menimbang Kearifan Lokal. Pendidikan dalam Perspektif Literasi. Bandung: Literacy Institute.
Yusuf, Suhendra. (2006b). Tingkat Literasi Membaca Siswa Indonesia dan Upaya Pengembangan Model Ujian Nasional Berbasis Literasi. Makalah disampaikan pada Seminar Nasional Hasil-hasil Studi Internasional di Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Jakarta, 7 September 2006.
Yusuf, Suhendra dan Wachyu Sundayana (2010). Analysis of The Determinants of Learning Outcomes Using Data from The International PIRLS & TIMSS (Content Analysis). Balitbang Depdiknas. 10 Desember 2009.
Yusuf, Suhendra dan Wahdi Suwardi. 2011. Indonesia in PISA 2009. Presentasi di Balitbang Kemendiknas 22 Maret 2011.
